nanog mailing list archives
RE: DDoS attacks
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:00:36 -0700
From: Rob Thomas [mailto:robt () cymru com] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:24 PM ] I happen to agree, if only because; when script kiddies don't have IRC to ] play with they'll start looking elsewhere. I'd rather them have an IRC net ] to play with while they're being hunted. Wouldn't you? Agreed. Keep in mind that when the kiddies really want to test something nasty, they simply build their own (hidden and secured) IRC servers in which to park the zombies. So a paucity of IRC servers/networks isn't an issue to them. Eradicating IRC isn't the solution. IRC is the "SOSUS net" of DDoS. It would be wise if everyone paid close attention to what is discovered therein.
Of course, it also wouldn't hurt if we actually STARTED a script-kiddie hunt, while they're making themselves so visible/vulnerable, rather than kvetching at the victim, neh?
Current thread:
- Re: DDoS attacks, (continued)
- Re: DDoS attacks Mitch Halmu (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks up (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Mitch Halmu (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Brad (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Andy Walden (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks (yum yum, troll food) Alex Bligh (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Mitch Halmu (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Scott Francis (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Jim Shankland (Jul 12)
- RE: DDoS attacks Brad (Jul 12)
- Speaking of DDoS attacks Robert Cannon (Jul 12)
- RE: DDoS attacks David Harmelin (Jul 12)
- RE: DDoS attacks Brad (Jul 12)
- RE: DDoS attacks Dan Hollis (Jul 12)
- RE: DDoS attacks Brad (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks up (Jul 12)
- Re: DDoS attacks Rafi Sadowsky (Jul 12)