nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Paul A Vixie <vixie () mfnx net>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 15:03:25 -0800
The category "OS vendors" gets a little fishy... Do Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox get on the list if they sign the NDA? How about Patrick Volkerding?
If they're mature trustworthy people (I know Linus but not those other guys) and if they need some time to get patches ready for large user bases, then I feel sure that they'd be welcomed gladly. Why are we discussing this on NANOG?
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Vivien M. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christian Kuhtz (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- BIND, djbdns, commercialization jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- genetic diversity w/ DNS bmanning (Feb 24)