nanog mailing list archives

Re: RFC 1918


From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:04:50 -0400 (EDT)



On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Bennett Todd wrote:

2000-07-14-20:06:30 Shawn McMahon:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:42:08PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
Unfortunately an increasing number of Internet users, with servers I
might add, are now behind DSL lines that have <1500-byte MTUs.....
[...]
So what are we going to do, folks; are we going to react to people
who are in this situation by saying "oh, well; guess I'm walled
off from you, too bad, so sad, dump that $50 connection and get a
T1 or get off my Internet", or are we going to adapt?

What kind of adaptation is necessary?

Traditionally that sort of thing hasn't been a problem; that's what
fragmentation is for.


Bennett,

We're talking about providers-of-the-masses being the direct upstream of
these devices.  They are more likely to do something less than 35:1
oversubscription than they are to deploy routers with the horsepower to
fragment for every one of their customers.


---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc




Current thread: