nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: Re: New Federal Law (COPPA)
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 01:42:58 EDT
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, "John A. Tamplin" wrote:
Need their email address for password verification? Sorry.Did you even read any of it first? It specifically exempts reponding to one-time requests from requiring parental consent. I presume you don't need to verify the address more than once.
You're being obtuse. Fine, if you're one of those people who can't comprehend hypotheticals, I'll give you concrete examples: Mailing lists. Slashdot. TV Guide. Those are examples of sites that must preserve information in order to provide their services.
Current thread:
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA), (continued)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) John Hall (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Andrew Brown (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Patrick Evans (Apr 22)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) John Hall (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Henry R. Linneweh (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Barry Shein (Apr 21)
- Fw: New Federal Law (COPPA) Moe Allen (Apr 21)
- Re: Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Shawn McMahon (Apr 21)
- Re: Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Henry R. Linneweh (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Peter Galbavy (Apr 25)
- Re: Re: Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Shawn McMahon (Apr 21)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Robert Cannon (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Andrew Brown (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Hank Nussbacher (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) David Lesher (Apr 24)
- RE: New Federal Law (COPPA) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Branden R. Williams (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Ron Buchalski (Apr 24)
- RE: New Federal Law (COPPA) Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Robert Cannon (Apr 24)
- Re: New Federal Law (COPPA) Robert Cannon (Apr 24)