nanog mailing list archives
Re: RADB Fees
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 20:26:06 -0500
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 09:51:56 -0800 "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wrote:
Free is fine and good, but sooner or later the landlords need to be paid and the fields need harvesting in order to make the bread such that the kids can eat. I don't mind nominal fees if it assures the continued existance of the service. My personal concern is that some of these high-dollar dot-com maniacs don't feel that they have a need to contribute towards the infrastructure.
Um, let us keep it the way it is. Whomever pays the piper, calls the tune. regards, fletcher
Current thread:
- RADB Fees Majdi Abbas (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Mr. James W. Laferriere (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Ted Frohling (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 26)
- RE: RADB Fees Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 31)
- Re: RADB Fees Fletcher E Kittredge (Oct 31)
- RE: RADB Fees Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 31)
- Re: RADB Fees Mr. James W. Laferriere (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Kevin Oberman (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RADB Fees Majdi Abbas (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Dean Anderson (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees John Patteson (Oct 25)
- Re: RADB Fees Patrick Greenwell (Oct 26)