nanog mailing list archives

Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users


From: Sheryl Chapin <schapin () ctel net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 08:47:58 -0500

That's right. It stops the practice of using a sacrificial account, from
AOL or netcom, to spam for a web-site that is otherwise protected. Does it
make a difference that they didn't spam from their own ISP? That customer
is *still* a spammer whether they did it from your site or not. Maybe
you're of the "It's alright as long as they don't do it here" crowd? Well,
that's one of the things that the RBL was built for. The rest of us don't
have to put up with your negligence.


I don't see it as "it's alright as long as they don't do it here".  I see
it as "I have control over my network, but not over anyone elses".  I have
an AUP that specifically states spamming is not allowed.  I have kicked off
users who have spammed.  However, I do not have an AUP that says "If you
ever spam anyone ever in the world on any network anywhere I will
disconnect whatever service you have".   I don't control the entire
internet, just my little piece of it. :-)


Sheryl Chapin
Senior Network Engineer
CommTel Internet    207.377.3508
Winthrop, Maine     schapin () ctel net



Current thread: