nanog mailing list archives

RE: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet


From: "Christian Kuhtz" <ck () adsu bellsouth com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 17:42:57 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Actually, what the FCC stated was that this tariff was filed
properly as
the DSL lines are an extension of GTE's inter-LATA frame network. 
Seems
pretty dubious to me, although it's not the whole Internet as 
long distance
thing which I was afraid of at first.  Apparently there's to be 
yet another
FCC statement on either access fees or reciprocal comp (I cant
remember
which but I think it's the latter) by the end of the week.  Those
RBOCs
must have a bunch of lobbyist hanging out at the FCC. 

.. just like every other industry or special interest group.  CLECs
come to mind..  Remember:  Lobbying is legalized bribery.

Cheers,
Chris

- --
Christian Kuhtz <ck () adsu bellsouth com> -wk     ck () gnu org -hm
Sr. Network Architect, BellSouth Corp., Advanced Data Services
NOTE: "We speak PGP: key available at well-known key servers."
            "Turnaucka's Law: The attention span of a computer 
             is only as long as its electrical cord."  
                                         -- /usr/games/fortune

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBNkTM0IRXnO1Cm58sEQIUUgCgnzTEVzN02gGcLUQdkebmC2a4oaUAoJRv
x90W1RpGCwM1kvGAr50ESWq2
=yJER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: