nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet


From: Peter Stemwedel <pstemwedel () interaccess com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 18:41:34 -0600

Actually, what the FCC stated was that this tariff was filed properly as
the DSL lines are an extension of GTE's inter-LATA frame network.  Seems
pretty dubious to me, although it's not the whole Internet as long distance
thing which I was afraid of at first.  Apparently there's to be yet another
FCC statement on either access fees or reciprocal comp (I cant remember
which but I think it's the latter) by the end of the week.  Those RBOCs
must have a bunch of lobbyist hanging out at the FCC. 

 At 06:22 PM 11/3/98 -0500, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
An Internet dialup call is an interstate call if you're in one state
dialing into a POP in another. Otherwise it's not. Duh.

The FCC has much better things to do than debate a point for which the
answer is painfully obvious. If you're going to tell me that when I dial
up to my account in downtown Cleveland from my house ten minutes away, I'm
going to either laugh at you, tell you you're a flaming idiot, or quite
possibly both.

Sorry. My ISDN line at home is serviced by Ameritech, and NACS's PRIs are
serviced by ICG/Netcom. Maybe I should get charged for a call from Chicago
to Denver since Ameritech is headquaratered in Chicago and ICG is in Denver,
even though I'm calling from Cleveland to Cleveland.

If there's something obvious that I'm missing here, please, PLEASE point it
out to me...

Oh yeah. Are they going to insist on charging per-minute for voice calls
as well as data calls? I bet not.


-- 
Steve Sobol [sjsobol () nacs net]
Part-time Support Droid [support () nacs net]
NACS Spaminator [abuse () nacs net]

Spotted on a bumper sticker: "Possum. The other white meat."




Peter Stemwedel
Network Engineer        
InterAccess Co.         petes () interaccess com
168 N. Clinton  (312) 496-4694 Office
Chicago, IL 60661       (312) 496-4499 FAX




Current thread: