nanog mailing list archives

Re: Root Name Server Confederations


From: Marc Hurst <mhurst () fastlane ca>
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 23:19:07 -0400 (EDT)



On Tue, 20 May 1997, Michael Dillon wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 1997, Ben Black wrote:

what happens when there is disagreement in the eDNS community and someone 
decides to break off and for Yet Another DNS Coalition?  or are you 
assuming such a thing will never happen?

It has already happened. The Alternic has broken off from the eDNS
community and no longer recognizes their TLDs. And name.space never did
join the eDNS community and has always had TLDs that conflict with eDNS. 
Now Karl Denninger has imposed some new rules on eDNS to place limits on
people who are trying to create more than 10 new TLDs. The universe in a
microcosm...

Interesting assumption when the ALTERNICS' single biggest creditor is an 
eDNS Regisratation Authority....

Liability issues?????


In any event, the US government seems quite happy to let the 114
signatories of the gTLD MoU work things out even though eDNS supporters
have vigorously lobbied for US government intervention. 

if there are multiple IANA blessed NICs, then so be it.  they will 
operate only as long as they follow the guidelines set down for them by a 
higher authority with no financial stake in the game.
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
An important point that so many people seem to miss.


Michael Dillon                   -               Internet & ISP Consulting
http://www.memra.com             -               E-mail: michael () memra com

The bottom line is track record.  Not track tearing.  Not track derailing.
But pounding the damn dirt around the track with the rest of us worms.
       -- Randy Bush



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: