nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Name Server Confederations
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 22:58:54 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 20 May 1997, Marc Hurst wrote:
their being operational makes them no less bogus. IANA says who answers for "." and eDNS aint it.Not only is that restraint of trade, I would like to see you make that defense stay in a court outside of the US.
not to be confused with the restraint of trade caused by TLD conflicts among all the eDNS folk. what happens if i decide to advertise 6.0.0.0/8 to the world? you think everyone would applaud me for freeing IP address space from the tyranical bonds of the evil IANA and its minion paul vixie, or would i be globally shunned for an action so obviously counter to the effective interoperation of all sections of the internet? you are doing exactly the same thing and none of your sabre rattling or name calling will change that. b3n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Root Name Server Confederations Jim Fleming (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Paul A Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Ben Black (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Ben Black (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations w0zz (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Craig A. Huegen (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Dave Crocker (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Geoff White (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Paul A Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Perry E. Metzger (May 21)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Michael Dillon (May 20)
- Re: Root Name Server Confederations Marc Hurst (May 20)