nanog mailing list archives

Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd)


From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 13:48:24 -0800 (PST)


On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Kim Hubbard wrote:

Yes, I know many (David and Geoff:-)) are probably calling me Pollyanna
right about now and it is true that most companies won't return it
if they think they can sell it.  But I think having a procedure in
place to at least begin reclaiming addresses from those organizations
that are no longer in business can only help matters.  

Kim

So tell me, what exactly is stopping you from doing so and why wasn't this
started one hell of a long time ago? Or are we just hearing more of the
typical rhetoric we've come to expect from the Nic.



There is a procedure in place and it has been used to great effect.
The last time the space was "exercised" to recover space, we recovered
about 13% of the total available IPv4 space.  That was in 1995.

There are plans underway to re-exercise the process to see what can be
done wrt the TWD.  I expect that this time the effort will be directed 
to reducing the routing table size and not so much recovery of IP space.

Check the 1995 NANOG archives and the IEPG archives.

--bill
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: