nanog mailing list archives
RE: Class "B" forsale (fwd)
From: Jim Browning <jfbb () atmnet net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 10:09:49 -0800
From: Vab Goel[SMTP:vgoel () sprint net] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 1997 10:18 PMOn Sat, 8 Mar 1997, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:What kinds of guarantees are there that if someone buys it, that they will actually be able to get and keep this Class B?If buyer & seller make a deal, with the current model buyer will be able to use it without any problem.
When what is actually happening differs wildly from documented policies, it is a pretty good sign that something needs to change. RFCs should either be followed or changed. Otherwise a crack is opened which may allow splinter groups to define their own policies in other areas (AlterNIC, etc.) - Jim Browning - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd), (continued)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) David R. Conrad (Mar 09)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Ichiro Mizukoshi (Mar 09)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Joseph T. Klein (Mar 09)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Kim Hubbard (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Brett L. Hawn (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) bmanning (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Hank Nussbacher (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Bill Manning (Mar 10)
- Re: Class "B" forsale (fwd) Karl Denninger (Mar 09)
- Routing Information guard (was Class "B" forsale ) Ichiro Mizukoshi (Mar 09)