nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP ... New Information
From: Phil Howard <phil () charon milepost com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:38:26 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Shields writes ...
If you have to filter someone, better to filter the small guys. You'll get fewer complaints than if you applied filters evenly.
So the complaint levels from the small guys are low enough that no one needs to worry about? OK, then let them complain all they want.
(Of course prefix length != connectivity value. But it's all we have.)
Then we need more. One way is to divide the IP space up into value tiers and bid for it. I'm sure NSI would be more than willing to do this :) -- Phil Howard KA9WGN +-------------------------------------------------------+ Linux Consultant | Linux installation, configuration, administration, | Milepost Services | monitoring, maintenance, and diagnostic services. | phil at milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------+
Current thread:
- Re: NSP ... New Information, (continued)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Germann (Jun 05)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bill Sommerfeld (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Karl Denninger (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Stan Barber (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Germann (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Kozowski (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Paul Ferguson (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Michael Shields (Jun 11)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Rodney Joffe (Jun 11)