nanog mailing list archives

RE: NSP ... New Information


From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:11:18 -0700

Might I suggest that a new group be set up to discuss and handle
operational issues? Clearly this is no longer it... and this list has no
value if we keep having to dig through the manure to find the pony. I'm
getting more spam from this list than I'm bouncing from AGIS. Enough
already. Please.


Rodney Joffe
Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company
http://www.genuity.net



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Ferguson [SMTP:pferguso () cisco com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 8:58 AM
To:   Phil Howard
Cc:   nanog () merit edu
Subject:      Re: NSP ... New Information

At 10:38 AM 06/11/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:


One way is to divide the IP space up into value tiers and bid for it.
I'm sure NSI would be more than willing to do this :)


Oh, no. Not this thread again. Somehow I get the feeling that the
signal/noise ratio is about to taka a nosedive again.

This issues has been hashed, and re-hashed, to death on various
mailing lists, to include NANOG. I would suggest that if this
is an issue that you wish to discuss/pursue, please take it to
the PIARA mailing list: piara-request () apnic net

- paul


Current thread: