nanog mailing list archives
RE: NSP ... New Information
From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 09:11:18 -0700
Might I suggest that a new group be set up to discuss and handle operational issues? Clearly this is no longer it... and this list has no value if we keep having to dig through the manure to find the pony. I'm getting more spam from this list than I'm bouncing from AGIS. Enough already. Please. Rodney Joffe Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company http://www.genuity.net
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Ferguson [SMTP:pferguso () cisco com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 8:58 AM To: Phil Howard Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: NSP ... New Information At 10:38 AM 06/11/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:One way is to divide the IP space up into value tiers and bid for it. I'm sure NSI would be more than willing to do this :)Oh, no. Not this thread again. Somehow I get the feeling that the signal/noise ratio is about to taka a nosedive again. This issues has been hashed, and re-hashed, to death on various mailing lists, to include NANOG. I would suggest that if this is an issue that you wish to discuss/pursue, please take it to the PIARA mailing list: piara-request () apnic net - paul
Current thread:
- Re: NSP ... New Information, (continued)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Karl Denninger (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Stan Barber (Jun 09)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Jim Fleming (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Germann (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Kozowski (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Paul Ferguson (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Michael Shields (Jun 11)
- RE: NSP ... New Information Rodney Joffe (Jun 11)