nanog mailing list archives

Re: T3 or not to T3


From: Chris Caputo <ccaputo () alt net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Dorian R. Kim wrote:
From a provider's point of view, if a site wanted to connect, andwas 
willing to sign a use-policy saying they wouldn't use the connection
for transit to other providers (i.e. would only ask for customer BGP and
only route to the nets you provide in BGP updates), would that site have
lower costs associated with it?  (that you could pass on?)
It would seem to me that, as long as the site is an interesting enough
traffic source, and the ISP can recoup whatever cost of offering that
connection + margin(or not). 
Speaking only for CICNet, given that the site is an interesting traffic
source, we'd gradly offer a connection for what it costs to provide that
connection, if such request came to us.

Who else will do this?  MCI, Sprint?  This seems like a new and growing
market.  Is it being added to the service menus of various backbones? 
We'd love to talk to any backbone that will do this.

Chris Caputo
President, Altopia Corporation

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: