nanog mailing list archives

Re: T3 or not to T3


From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:22:06 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Avi Freedman wrote:

I hear that Sprint, one of the few large providers (that imposes filters
on customer BGP sessions) that still bases customer peering filters on 
as-path filters rather than on a per-session route filter list either 
manually constructed or built automagically from databases, is considering 
going or is going to go to route filtering its customer sessions rather 
than as-path filtering.  Now, I'm talking here about the BGP sessions, 

This makes sense is this the "Right Way" to do things, IMO. However, this
requires a significant degree of router configuration automation, and some
sort a reliable database to do in a large scale. 

But then again, I'm sure Sprint has the resources to handle this type of a
challenge.

-dorian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: