nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: jon () branch com (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 19:15:13 -0500 (EST)
We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now. Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG) 60% - invalid or missing contact information
This is interesting. How about a policy that says if nobody can contact you and none of your addresses are reachable, then after some period, your addresses get recycled.
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Noel Chiappa (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Michael Dillon (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations bmanning (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Edward Henigin (Feb 14)