nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: George Herbert <gherbert () crl com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 11:17:16 -0800
It only gets really touchy if few of the backbones touch down in the area. Unfortunately, this is exactly the case in which geographic addressing doesn't work so well any more, and we have no way to mandate that backbones touch down.
Name a backbone which doesn't come into the San Francisco Bay Area. This is the area I want to try the idea out in. In terms of physical touchdowns, they are all in place. The only barrier is getting most of the backbones to willingly participate in the experiment. A very significant chunk of new domains and new ISPs are here, in the 415/408/510 area code regions (and 707, which is next door and could be included if we wanted...). -george william herbert gherbert () crl com
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Noel Chiappa (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)