MSFXDC #1 First modules

[egypt at metasploit.com (egypt at metasploit.com)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jerome,

Your page says nothing about requiring the submitted modules to be a
certain license and unless they are marked as such, you cannot just
assume everything is BSD license.  I strongly suggest contacting the
original authors before making claims like this.

egypt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkluJ70ACgkQABHabZqEWJ2m9wCfeFVEHpnkJGajQUa/hujA8qXb
8Y8An2Fbh71mJ71hH8mK7CVjddLzixoq
=OnoM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Jerome Athias <jerome.athias at free.fr> wrote:
> You should consider them under BSD licence. (you can just replace
> MSF_LICENSE)
> No problem do add them into the msf trunk.
>
> Regards
> /JA
>
> Patrick Webster a ?crit :
> > Once again there are issues with licensing.
> >
> > If you're referring to mc's modules, many of them are still
> > work-in-progress, hence they are not committed to SVN.
> >
> > I'm sure he'll commit them when they're ready...
> >
> > -Patrick
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
> _______________________________________________
> http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework