Metasploit mailing list archives
MSFXDC #1 First modules
From: patrick at aushack.com (Patrick Webster)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:27:26 +1100
I'm happy to include them, but there are a few issues: 1) What license are they released under? MSF? BSD? Commercial/Leaked? A lot of rogue modules state MSF_LICENSE, but this may have been ignored by the author (who actually reads licenses, anyway? :P) 2) We need to review the quality of the code, bugs, exploit, references, reliability etc. 3) Test the exploits... hard to find for large enterprise software (legally, anyway). 4) Do the authors even want their modules added, and what of their name/nick/email etc. The main issue being #1. There must be over 100 uncommitted modules out there... but it is not easy to track the authors down. Perhaps we should include a "# Please submit new modules to msfdev@" in the framework module comments header (for all existing modules). If people copy a module in the future to make their own, maybe a few authors will read it and action. Better than none. I guess JA can ask the authors these questions. -Patrick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20090114/9a409470/attachment.htm>
Current thread:
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Jerome Athias (Jan 10)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Richard Miles (Jan 13)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Patrick Webster (Jan 13)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Richard Miles (Jan 13)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Patrick Webster (Jan 13)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Jerome Athias (Jan 14)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules egypt at metasploit.com (Jan 14)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Jerome Athias (Jan 14)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Patrick Webster (Jan 13)
- MSFXDC #1 First modules Richard Miles (Jan 13)