Re: Music industry proposes a piracy surcharge on ISPs

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Ernie Longmire <interestingpeople-lazlo () studio-nibble com>
Date: March 16, 2008 1:38:50 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:   Music industry proposes a piracy surcharge on  
ISPs

What's "equitable" about a system that completely decouples  
compensation from the actual use of the properties the monies are  
supposedly paying for?  If there were a way to accurately detect which  
files are actually  being moved across the network and how often  
they're moved, they'd already be using it -- to stop the downloading  
in the first place.

And how can this system have "nothing whatsoever to do with  
government" when the only entity in a position to "allow access to  
*all* music" is the government (which could only allow do so by  
throwing away the copyright system)?

It's really easy to call this solution a "fair price to pay" when it's  
not your creations that are being collectivized!


-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com