Re: no poison for Joplin

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

On 5/31/11 5:11 PM, der Mouse wrote:
> > > Spammers are sociopathic monsters.
> > No, they are merely entrepreneurs with no morals and a criminal
> > tendency.
>
> I think you are in furious agreement here.
>
> No morals generally implies a criminal tendency, since crimes are
> mostly things that are, except for their antisocial and/or immoral
> attributes, attractive one way or another.  (Unattractive things
> generally don't get done enough to be made into crimes.)
>
> I also think that "no morals" _is_ "sociopathic" in many respects.

I can see your point if we discuss it philosophically, however, these 
things have clinical definitions. A spammer may be a regular human being 
such as you or I, with very similar psychology. A sociopath very likely 
isn't.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.