Re: [privacy] Who is paying for the Iraq War

[Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com>]

Sorry to respond to this email, "BUT" that is not the conversation that was
intended to be started. The Gentleman who responded to my email, just
mentioned that it is off the topic and that NO one really knows what is
behind which move. So, I would request everyone to stop talking about IRAQ
War talk in the Privacy listing.

This is not what I intended to start. What I was talking about is about the
Government, which is concentrating on many different things and lacking its
concentration on certain issues that might become a loophole for the bad
ones to enter into the nation. It is about loss of privacy or data theft,
and not about Iraq war.

Kind Regards,
Shyaam

On 7/21/07, rms () computerbytesman com <rms () computerbytesman com> wrote:
> We got a much better deal in the 1991 Iraq War.  The Saudi's paid for
> about 75% of the costs of the war.  Cheney was in charge of the sales job
> in 1991.  He told the Saudi's if you don't stop Saddam in Kuwait, you're
> next.
>
> Richard
>
>
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Brian Loe (knobdy () gmail com)
> > wrote:
> >> On 7/21/07, Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Instead of conquering other nations and gaining more money in war,
> >>
> >> I agree with virtually everything you said, except this statement. Its
> >> been shown that we have spent more money running up to and invading
> >> Iraq than we could have ever hoped to get out of the oil Iraq
> >> possesses. It wasn't a war for oil.
> >
> > You conflate two things here that are not even close to the same.  The
> > monetary cost of invading Iraq will be paid for by the taxpayers and
> > their grandchildren.  The profits from the oil will accrue to others.
> > Under no circumstance will oil profits be applied against the national
> > debt.
> > --
> > Ken Dyke,
> > 406.581.0495
> >
> > "Linux can win as long as services/protocols are commodities.  By
> folding
> > extended functionality into today's commodity services and creating new
> > protocols, we raise the bar and change the rules of the game."
> >        -- from an internal Microsoft memo
> > _______________________________________________
> > privacy mailing list
> > privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
> > http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> privacy mailing list
> privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy



--
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
Shyaam Sundhar R.S., GREM, GHTQ, GWAS, GPCI

_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy