Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president

[Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com>]

Ken,

The argument is diverted completely, the topic was on Privacy. He tried
indicating that I was saying something unknowingly, but he wasnt trying to
justify someone's decisions.

Shyaam

On 7/21/07, Ken Dyke <kdyke () keycomputerconsultants com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Brian Loe (knobdy () gmail com)
> wrote:
> > On 7/21/07, Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > Instead of conquering other nations and gaining more money in war,
> >
> > I agree with virtually everything you said, except this statement. Its
> > been shown that we have spent more money running up to and invading
> > Iraq than we could have ever hoped to get out of the oil Iraq
> > possesses. It wasn't a war for oil.
>
> You conflate two things here that are not even close to the same.  The
> monetary cost of invading Iraq will be paid for by the taxpayers and
> their grandchildren.  The profits from the oil will accrue to others.
> Under no circumstance will oil profits be applied against the national
> debt.
> --
> Ken Dyke,
> 406.581.0495
>
> "Linux can win as long as services/protocols are commodities.  By folding
> extended functionality into today's commodity services and creating new
> protocols, we raise the bar and change the rules of the game."
>        -- from an internal Microsoft memo
> _______________________________________________
> privacy mailing list
> privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy



--
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
Shyaam Sundhar R.S., GREM, GHTQ, GWAS, GPCI

_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy