Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 7/6/06, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
> On 7/6/06, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > If this issue degrades to a free market vs communism debate, then we
> > have lost the ability to communicate because most have already made up
> > their mind and are unwilling to change it.
> >
> > If you think that letting businesses police themselves is a valid
> > option, then nothing I can say will change your mind. Enjoy your
> > electric car, secure operating systems, and cancer cures.
> >
> > -JP<the dirty stinking commie>
>
> What is your point? Are you arguing idealsim vs. reality? This
> argument IS about the free market - of money and ideas. That's not
> what we're "degrading" the argument to, it is what it is.

Free Market wouldnt include telling telco's they couldnt raise the
rates on us, right?


> >
> > Q: What is the difference between a piece of paper and a piece of money?
> > A: The money is a piece of paper that has been blessed by the treasury wizards.
> >
> > The money is only worth something because we all agree on it.
>
> The answer is your comment, actually. Has nothing to do with the
> "treasury wizards". I'm all for going back to the gold standard,  but
> I'm not sure what you're trying to say...

Its a semi quote by the Android Sisters from Ruby the Galactic Gumshoe :-)

I am not trying to say anything, just replying in kind to what i
receive. My replies to you have less and less to do with reality ;-)

-JP<the super-dork>
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.