Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

[Gregory Hicks <ghicks () cadence com>]

> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:30:11 -0400
> From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
> To: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?
> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
[...]
> Getting back to the thread though: Vixie said:
>
>
> "last but not least, i want steve linford to be welcome at NANOG and IETF
> meetings held in the US (and even those held in indiana, if ever.)  having
> him taken from the airport in handcuffs would be a real buzz-killer for me."
>
> Is that a possibility? Did Spamhaus break the law by not being in the
> courts jurisdiction?

No But if he *had* admitted jurisdiction and lost, there might have
been a posibility that a warrant be made out because he (SpamHaus) did
not comply with the court's orders.  (Contempt of court or something...)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Hicks                        | Principal Systems Engineer
Cadence Design Systems               | Direct:   408.576.3609
555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1
San Jose, CA 95134 

I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes.  I will surely
learn a great deal today.

"A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for
lunch.  Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the
decision." - Benjamin Franklin

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.