funsec mailing list archives
Re: guilty until proven innocent?
From: "David Lodge" <dave () cirt net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:15:07 -0000
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:02:56 -0000, Gary Funck <gary () intrepid com> wrote: [Question about captured screenshots] It all depends on how they monitor websites, a few ideas occur: * The sprogling has badly remembered what happened.* The admin visited the sites/replayed the session and took screenshots from his own screen. * The visits to the sites alerted the admin who used a remote control app to view what was being browsed.
* The monitoring software screen shots the session. dave _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: guilty until proven innocent?, (continued)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Gary Funck (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Drsolly (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Blue Boar (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Drsolly (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Blue Boar (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Austin (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Dude VanWinkle (Jan 27)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Gary Funck (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Larry Seltzer (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 29)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? David Lodge (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Mary Landesman (Jan 23)