funsec mailing list archives
RE: guilty until proven innocent?
From: "Henderson, Dennis K." <Dennis.Henderson () umb com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:25:51 -0600
Nick responded to Larry,
He was "under attack" _at his school_ for his use of _school computing resources_. If he truly only did use Safari on the schools (possibly Mac-only) systems, I can easily see him "honestly" saying "I never use IE, only Safari" and that could be true _in that computing environment_, and it's certainly much easier to say and sounds better, though is not more or less contextually truthful, than the possibly complete "At school I never use IE, only Safarai, whereas at home I use Firefox except when editing my blog". I agree it seems contradictory given what little we _really_ know of all the "facts" and I really don't care one way or the other. I was just pointing out that we should not rush to judgement either way on such extremely slight information...
Especially with today's kids who live in a vignetted world. You ask a question and you only get the bare minimum of information back, not a fully cross-examined response... :) Dennis _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: guilty until proven innocent?, (continued)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Blue Boar (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Austin (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Dude VanWinkle (Jan 27)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Gary Funck (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Larry Seltzer (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 29)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? David Lodge (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 28)
- RE: guilty until proven innocent? Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- Re: guilty until proven innocent? Mary Landesman (Jan 23)