Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:57:50 +1100
I still think press drives many and more takedowns, and bends the arms of others to.. for sure. I know of a case here of petty crime, but is relevant ok, the guy had many many, and big charges of murder,manslaughter, in other states within australia, but was asked for his name, in 'vic' , wich (about 10yrs ago - pre babybrother to usa) , draconian like laws enabled police to yes, put ppl in jail for this. So, he took the temporary jail, and monthly, would b brought b4 the judge, and asked again eveytime for the name/address so his infos could be checked. each time he would return... waiting for laws to change. evtually, they just had no room, and threw him out with a slap ion wrist fine... then later, they could not do crap about his murder etc, and he is still free t this day, simply by doing alittle bit of that time, and, not taking the *definate 15+* :P Smart, and only would happen NON usa, but yes, USA and USA press has TOO much power in court, altho online, I think the press if it gets involed* it is always seen as big, because since when is ITsec involved?only wen you hear of mass fraud...etc....so, any case would become classed as "oh must be fraud or sumthin BIG for them to get arrested..."... is indeed fact... but, it does take sometimes the press, or others, to simply expose it. many cases are, self explanatory but, some cases are really interesting... although, laws change somuch in usa, it is scarier than the other scary bits ;p cheers, xd On 5 October 2011 13:52, adam <adam () papsy net> wrote:
Its frightening how much power judges have, and how poorly theyare overseen. Definitely agree there. Some of the civil cases are disgustingly bad, due to there being no media attention and no real oversight. The civil case mentioned above is a good example, and all of the excessive child support orders even further that. On topic: I haven't read every single reply here, but from what I've seen: no one has mentioned the VPN provider being held personally responsible. Being that the attacks originated from machines they own, if they failed to turn over user information, could it really be that difficult to pin the attacks on them and convince a judge that they were responsible? On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com> wrote:On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:32 PM, adam <adam () papsy net> wrote:http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00754.htmDid you actually read the link you pasted? [...] and "criminal penalties may not be imposed on someone who has notbeenafforded the protections that the Constitution requires of such criminal proceedings [...] protections include the right [..] Then take a look at the actual rights being referenced. Most of whichwouldbe violated as a result. In response to 0x41 "This is ONCE you are actually in front, of the judge...remember, it may take some breaking of civil liberty, for thistohappen... " No, you're absolutely right. That's the point here. Contempt is attachedtothe previous court order, there wouldn't be a new judge/new case for the contempt charge alone. All of it is circumstantial anyway, especiallydue tohow much power judges actually have (in both criminal AND civil proceedings).Its frightening how much power judges have, and how poorly they are overseen. Confer: Judge James Ware, US 9th Circuit Court (this is not a local judge in a hillbilly town). Jeff_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general..., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... adam (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Laurelai (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... adam (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... coderman (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing (Oct 05)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Darren Martyn (Oct 05)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... xD 0x41 (Oct 06)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... xD 0x41 (Oct 05)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... adam (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Ferenc Kovacs (Oct 11)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Jeffrey Walton (Oct 06)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Laurelai (Oct 06)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... xD 0x41 (Oct 05)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Antony widmal (Oct 03)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Laurelai (Oct 03)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Georgi Guninski (Oct 04)
- Re: VPN providers and any providers in general... Laurelai Storm (Oct 04)