Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: go public to avoid jail


From: PsychoBilly <zpamh0l3 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:46:04 +0200

************************  Cluster #[[   J Roger   ]] possibly emitted, @Time [[   03/05/2010 22:09   ]] The Following 
#String  **********************
    There were excerpts in the Wired article, and there are more in the
    court record


One has to begin wondering:

A) Why did Gonzales keep logs of incriminating evidence against himself
and his friends in the first place?
B) What motivation did Gonzales have for rolling over on Stephen like
that? Given Stephen's minor involvement in the case, it seems like
Gonzales wouldn't get much by way of a plea deal by turning him in.
C) Another Wired article states that Gonzales was an informer paid an
annual salary by the Secret Service. This revelation apparently was
brought to light by Stephen himself. Did The_UT know this was the case
before his arrest or only after? If he knew these circumstances prior to
his arrest then why would he be willing to create a custom tool for a
person he knows is informing on people?

Rather simple:
1- G is known to have links with agencies.
2- He's giving info-dumps about scene since a long time after being caught once ( and to avoid 'divine retribution' )
3- the_UT thought those relations would act as a magic voodoo talisman.
4- Gonzales played dirty, to relax charges a little, there's why logs were logged ( yes, associals friendship, my 
friends, well, just sucks... )

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: