Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert
From: Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:45:53 -0800
Alright, enough of the off-topic crap. Back to the topic, being that lists.grok.co.uk should get a non-self-signed cert. The cancer infesting fd and the merits of CAs are irrelevant to the thread.
Oh, ok, so maybe you'd prefer we talk about Palestine, moderation, or netdev's latest drivel? I think it's on topic for the list. I'll change the subject next time I post on the matter if it makes you feel better (or even if it doesn't). tim tim _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert, (continued)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Tim (Jan 05)
- The merits and uses of CAs Christopher Pritchard (Jan 05)
- Re: The merits and uses of CAs Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Tim (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert chort (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Volker Tanger (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Tim (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Avraham Schneider (Jan 06)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert Tim (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert anonymous pimp (Jan 05)
- Re: anonymous pimp's ideas of list etiquette (was: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert) Tim (Jan 05)
- Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert A . L . M . Buxey (Jan 06)