Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert

["anonymous pimp" <anonymouspimp () gmail com>]

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Gary Wilson <dragon () dragons org uk> wrote:
> Having had enough of the non-topic junk this list has become recently, I
> went to unsub, but it seems the SSL cert is not valid/trusted.
>
> For the mods, I guess:
>
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> lists.grok.org.uk uses an invalid security certificate.
>
> The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted.
>
> (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer)
>
>
>    * This could be a problem with the server's configuration, or it could
> be someone trying to impersonate the server.
>
>    * If you have connected to this server successfully in the past, the
> error may be temporary, and you can try again later.
>
> --
> GW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Alright, enough of the off-topic crap. Back to the topic, being that
lists.grok.co.uk should get a non-self-signed cert. The cancer
infesting fd and the merits of CAs are irrelevant to the thread.

kthnxbai

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/