Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] QuietMove ( D - )


From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:18:38 -0800

On Jan 1, 2008 8:51 PM, reepex <reepex () gmail com> wrote:
...
So you list 5 tools they use then mention they modify a javascript
library...  So basically they use automated tools and  are former  web
developers ... sound pretty hardcore

this is sufficient skill for lucrative security audit / validation
testing in the corporate / gov world.  i don't think anyone would call
that 'hardcore' exploit / pentest / redteam ability...

are you in it for money or love?  this changes the aspect entirely.

the majority of security services paid for by these organizations is
routine application of accepted industry guidelines as defined by
usually bulky and cumbersome committees of varied competence and
efficacy...

this, and the complete lack of rigor / utility of secreview's sewaqe
writing, is why i could care not even half a mouse's shit less about
any of these reviews.

please shut the fuck up secreview.  kthx

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: