Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: We're letting the bad guys win


From: Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:43:01 -0500

ditto.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM, waveroad waveroad <waveroad () gmail com> wrote:
You're the fucking idiot.
GET OUT OF HERE


2008/12/9, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>:

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com>
wrote:
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
wrote:


On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said:
We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
bad, this isn't what infosec should be about.

It's making one very small insignificant corner of infosec look bad.

Let's keep a sense of perspective, guys.

Or, to look at it another way, it's tying up all the idiots in one place
and
keeping the rest of infosec unsullied.  :-)



I agree,
But full-disclosure shouldn't be full of idiots so why do we let it be
that way. It's because we reply to them that it happens. I was
gullible and naive to reply to them, i'm not replying to them anymore.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: