Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired


From: Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:03:08 -0400


Your argument amounts to "The lesser of two evils", which is NOT the same
as ethical behaviour.

True.  So far, I don't think anyone has made a philosophically sound
argument either way.  My take on it, is that these programs (as
advertized) are neither moral nor immoral, but are rather amoral.  They
can be used for "good" and for "evil" (according to numerous definitions
of each).

I think while these purchasing programs make it easier to "do the right
thing" by reporting bugs to the "right people", they also reduce the
effort required to make money on immoral activities, such as the
purposeful planting of bugs in code and the leaking of bugs into black
markets.

Of course, if the "right people" are morally impaired (by your
definition of morality), then perhaps these programs lean slightly to
the dark side.  Of course, there's no real way to know that.

tim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: