Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage
From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:07:49 -0500
But the original poster claimed to be part of the defacement group. And they claimed to have defaced the main site for Squid proxy - which was not the website posted in the original message So, they have forum about the software....it still isn't the main site for the proxy software. Why would there be CVS code for the squid software on a gaming forum? Either they defaced the wrong site...and the gaming site was restore with lighting speed...without anyone knowing about it..or they aren't being truthful. Does not their silence about this matter answer the question?
-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Andrew Haninger Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:00 PM To: James Lay Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage On 7/26/05, James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net> wrote:Maybe he/she should stop gaming for second and check the site ;)Also FWIW, there is a section of the squid.org forums that is devoted to the proxy software. There is a note that squid.org is not affiliated with the proxy software that goes by the same name, but that Squid users seem to like to post there. So, squid.org is at least partially related to squid-cache.org. Oddly enough, I did not see anything in the forums about a defacement. I still wonder about how any documentation or README files in the CVS tree are now backdoored. -Andy _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage, (continued)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Michael Weinert (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage bugtraq (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage milw0rm Inc. (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Daniel (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Rodrigo Barbosa (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Diego Casati (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Andrew Haninger (Jul 26)
- Re: INFOHACKING and illusion brazilian b0ys ownage Hugo Vazquez Carapez (Jul 26)
- Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired J.A. Terranson (Jul 26)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Adam Jones (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Etaoin Shrdlu (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired J u a n (Jul 27)
- Re[2]: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired phased (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired J.A. Terranson (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired James Tucker (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Tim (Jul 27)
- Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Andrew Simmons (Jul 28)