Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why is IRC still around?
From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 05:46:38 +0000
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:34:03 -0600, vord <vordhosbn () gmail com> wrote:
i didn't get responses from anyone i knew ... i got responses from people who knew you, get it? btw, our offer still stands. if you would like to try and substantiate your claims, feel free to come back and try your hardest. this is over and never should have begun. DO NOT REPLY. I WILL NOT RESPOND. --vord
Ok, I won't reply to call you and this e-mail childish. Too bad, my finger slipped. Thanks, n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Why is IRC still around?, (continued)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 25)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? vord (Nov 26)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 26)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 22)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? xtrecate (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? bkfsec (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Tim (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? chris neitzert (Nov 20)