RE: Avoiding traceability (was: Calculating Loss)

[Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>]

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 12:42, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> If you convert your pringles can properly it should work from your bedroom
> window as well. :-)

lol.... yeah, I saw that one coming....

> Go ahead and use your home internet conenction if you must.  Just be
> carefull who you annoy enough to track you down.  If the Feds supect
> you they can get a warrant and tap your line.

Agreed. The mobility of (mis)using wireless networks helps evading
profiling and taps.

> Do not expect any
> encryption to be a protection, the Feds say they have never been stumped
> by encryption.

Right, but (not including weak and breakable encryption) isn't that
because they can get the keys through other means? (as in physical
access, including planting hardware or software keyloggers [Scarfo])

Anyhow, probably drifting off topic now. I concede that there are
definitely advantages that unsecured wireless connections offer in term
of becoming untraceable (and complete decoupling of all things
physical). But I still believe that open proxies are easier and more
convenient to use.

Regards,
Frank


PS: Not that I do these things of course.... perhaps a real blackhat or
two that do hack anonymously can speak up and tell us what they use to
anonymize themselves.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part