Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Calcuating Loss
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:15:50 -0400
On Tue, 11 May 2004 16:30:46 BST, Jos Osborne <Jos () meltemi co uk> said:
How about when Micro$oft releases a bundled patch (cough cough MS04-011) to fix several bugs and security holes (supposedly to help "minimize loss" from these bugs and worms) only to find out that the patch itself has broken just as many services as it fixed, taking down one's server for a few hours, causing yet... more loss! ;-)Grrrr - that little pressie from M$ cost us a whole morning...
"You can chalk up a morning's worth of semi-scheduled losses now, or chalk up even more losses when you have to install patches *after* cleaning the worm off". "You can pay me $500, or you can pay the hospital $4,000 to have your kneecaps fixed". Draw your own conclusions about any family resemblance between those two statements. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Calcuating Loss Jos Osborne (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Calcuating Loss Jos Osborne (May 11)
- Re: Calcuating Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Schmidt, Michael R. (May 11)
- Re: Calcuating Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: Calcuating Loss Alexander Schreiber (May 11)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Schmidt, Michael R. (May 12)
- Re: Calcuating Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Frank Knobbe (May 12)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Gary E. Miller (May 12)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Frank Knobbe (May 12)
- RE: Calcuating Loss Gary E. Miller (May 12)
- RE: Avoiding traceability (was: Calculating Loss) Frank Knobbe (May 12)