Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Psexec on *NIX
From: <xtrecate () spymac com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 23:01:45 -0700
One can't always be sure that SSH will be installed on the _Windows_ server you'd like to run a command on. At least not in large windows networks. Psexec does not rely on any 3rd party service installations (i.e. ssh), and so should function across a domain and via vpn with no additional software needed. IMHO needing to run the occasional command on a single machine amongst thousands doesn't warrant widespread ssh (or whatever) deployment. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:54 PM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Psexec on *NIX On Thu, 6 May 2004, Chris Carlson wrote:
then use it, but it doesn't make sense to do so. Why would I install and run an ssh daemon just to use it to run another program, then delete
What unix comes without any kind of remote login service such as sshd, rexec, telnetd or alike? Is the thing you're looking for the security model that windows has, in that you can authenticate to any machine running on same domain and that's how it knows if you're allowed to execute commands? There is no such thing default in *NIX. You're probably looking for something like Kerberos (which is what Microsoft used as far as I know) but it doesnt come standard with most unixes. According to <http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/psexec.shtml> psexec is a "lightweight telnet replacement", so I don't understand what it does that ssh/telnet doesnt do for you? You can use "ssh <host> -l <username> ifconfig" to run "ifconfig" directly on a remote computer without having to actually login and get a prompt on that machine, if that's what you were looking for. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Psexec on *NIX, (continued)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Ondrej Krajicek (May 06)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX hybriz (May 06)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Ondrej Krajicek (May 07)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Nico Golde (May 07)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Chris Carlson (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Scott Taylor (May 06)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Jon S. (May 06)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Ondrej Krajicek (May 07)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Michael Gargiullo (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Mikael Abrahamsson (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX xtrecate (May 08)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Ron DuFresne (May 10)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Frank Knobbe (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Pavel Kankovsky (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Paul Schmehl (May 06)
- RE: [inbox] RE: Psexec on *NIX Exibar (May 06)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX Ondrej Krajicek (May 07)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (May 07)
- Re: Psexec on *NIX sashman (May 07)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Ian Latter (May 06)
- RE: Psexec on *NIX Ian Latter (May 06)
(Thread continues...)