Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c
From: Person <devon () meatpuppet lithiumnode com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
It astounds me that so many people on this list (well, two) use the full disclosure ethic as an excuse to oblige programmers to give up our privacy rights and divulge all their code to a group of strangers. Can you *seriously* not see the problem with someone taking credit for someone else's work? That is just exquisite bullshit, regardless of the nature of the code itself, or with whom it was initially shared. Tobias was right on the money to take issue with this, and some of you need to back off and let talented hackers claim a little due credit and take pride in their work once in a while. [t] On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Brown, Rodrick wrote:
Sour grapes next time release it to all or keep it to your self. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Ferris, Robin Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:54 PM To: Full-Disclosure Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Rox on! -----Original Message----- From: Cael Abal [mailto:lists () onryou com] Sent: 17 September 2003 16:46 To: Full-Disclosure Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.cfrew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to packetstorm i cant understand why pplz does that are they not able to got there own skills i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never released but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haederanddisclosures it attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago/me blinks That's so unethical of them!!! Unfortunately, we have only your word as proof that you were the first to exploit the xlog off-by-one. Next time, be the first one to publically release your exploit to Full-Disclosure, that way you'll be sure to get credit! Good luck! Cael _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Tobias Klein (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Ferris, Robin (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Brown, Rodrick (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 18)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)