Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c
From: Person <devon () lithiumnode com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
I can vouch for this - mounty.c is the original. [d] On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tobias Klein wrote:
frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to packetstorm i cant understand why pplz does that are they not able to got there own skills i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never released but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder and disclosures it attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago newroot
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Tobias Klein (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Ferris, Robin (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Brown, Rodrick (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 18)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)