Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c


From: "Ferris, Robin" <R.Ferris () napier ac uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:53:56 +0100

Rox on!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cael Abal [mailto:lists () onryou com]
Sent: 17 September 2003 16:46
To: Full-Disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c


frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes
anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to 
packetstorm

i cant understand why pplz does that
are they not able to got there own skills
i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never 
released
but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder and
disclosures it

attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago

/me blinks

That's so unethical of them!!!

Unfortunately, we have only your word as proof that you were the first
to exploit the xlog off-by-one.  Next time, be the first one to
publically release your exploit to Full-Disclosure, that way you'll be
sure to get credit!

Good luck!

Cael


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: