Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c
From: Cael Abal <lists () onryou com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:46:00 -0400
frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyesanyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to packetstormi cant understand why pplz does that are they not able to got there own skillsi have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never releasedbut some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder and disclosures it attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago
/me blinks That's so unethical of them!!! Unfortunately, we have only your word as proof that you were the first to exploit the xlog off-by-one. Next time, be the first one to publically release your exploit to Full-Disclosure, that way you'll be sure to get credit! Good luck! Cael _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Tobias Klein (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Ferris, Robin (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Brown, Rodrick (Sep 17)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)
- Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Cael Abal (Sep 18)
- RE: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c Person (Sep 17)