Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: new ssh exploit?
From: Damian Gerow <damian () sentex net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:04:11 -0400
Thus spake Bennett Todd (bet () rahul net) [18/09/03 16:19]:
Fair call. I didn't try 1.4. Just did, it crashed the same way; but it would have been more responsible on my part if I'd done that test before saying anything.
Then I'll concede, and say that lsh isn't as stable as it should be.
bugs lists are different, developers who care don't throw any barriers in the way of people submitting bug reports. Bayesian filtering makes spam disappear, the problem is overrated:-).
I was wondering why they only have the one list. There's only bugs, no discussion, no development. Odd... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: new ssh exploit?, (continued)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 17)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Ron DuFresne (Sep 16)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 16)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Ron DuFresne (Sep 16)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 16)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Blue Boar (Sep 16)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 17)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Damian Gerow (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Damian Gerow (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Perry E. Metzger (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? KF (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? KF (Sep 18)
- lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Bennett Todd (Sep 19)
- Re: lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Carl Livitt (Sep 19)
- Re: lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Niels Möller (Sep 19)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Shanphen Dawa (Sep 16)