Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
From: KF <dotslash () snosoft com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 22:45:23 -0400
Nah its just bad grammer... should simply be partial disclosure. =] -KF
Am I the only one who finds the phrase `limited full disclosure' an oxymoron? dhtml> [snip] -- Raju
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER dhtml (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER morning_wood (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Ron DuFresne (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Raj Mathur (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER KF (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Stephen Clowater (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Georgi Guninski (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER bugtraq (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER madsaxon (Jul 14)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER security snot (Jul 15)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER bugtraq (Jul 15)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER dhtml (Jul 15)
- RE: Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Richard M. Smith (Jul 15)
- Re: Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 15)
- RE: Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Richard M. Smith (Jul 15)
(Thread continues...)