Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:18:48 -0700
if the worm was active in anticipation of a patch that intoduced a new exploit vector and it took advantage of that, is'nt the vendor ( microsoft ) to blame then? As well there was plenty of advanced warning on this exploit long before msblast was an issue. It seems to me that it is each admins responsiblity, if they were affected ( infected ) not the coder. if this were the case the LastStage(of)Delerium would be the blamed party for developing and releasing the exploit, but alas.. they are not of USA orgin. SUE LITIGATE BLAME PROCECUTE as long as the general public remains uneducated ( and many Fortune500 admins) we will continue to see this type of action against coders for blame, not the people actualy responsible for allowing thier infrastructure to become targets in the first place. im sure this ignorance is a byproduct of the weak mind of most Americans as they are in a constant state to blame other for thier own problems, this can be seen everywhere in todays American society... commonly refered as to the "poor me" syndrome.. Q. why did you murder the victim? A. my father never told me he loved me ( real answer - you pulled the triger ) Q. why was my network compromised? A. because of someone else ( real answer - you suck at internet ) muh 2 bytes, morning_wood ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Ballowe" <hangman-fulldisclosure () steelballs org> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:14:51PM -0000, 00005702 () no-id com wrote:And this kid is dumb enough be be living in the U.S.A. man, when are people going to learn, next we will here that he has been charged with every penny the worm caused and will be sentence under the new and ever improving Terrorist act.Interesting -- the net cost of the worm is actually a net $0.00. For every penny that a company chalks up as a cost to the worm, some other company must be chalking up the cost as a profit from the worm. -Charlie _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Larry Roberts (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Florian Weimer (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Stephen Clowater (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Nick FitzGerald (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Stephen Clowater (Aug 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect 00005702 (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Charles Ballowe (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect morning_wood (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect madsaxon (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Ben Nelson (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Daniel C. Sobral (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Charles Ballowe (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Rob Carlson (Aug 29)
- RE: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Chris DeVoney (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect morning_wood (Aug 29)
- Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect (long reply) Chris DeVoney (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect (long reply) Paul Schmehl (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Florian Weimer (Aug 29)
- Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)