Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets

[Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com>]

--On Tuesday, March 17, 2009 22:01:48 +0100 Damiano Bolzoni 
<damiano.bolzoni () utwente nl> wrote:

> On 16/03/2009 19.39, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> > Unless you can be more specific, I'm going to call your claim bogus. It
> > is entirely possible to write one snort signature that will detect
> > *every* instance of an attempt to overflow a buffer in a particular
> > applicaiton no matter what the attack "signature" is. You just have to
> > understand the snort logic and syntax and understand packet analysis
> > well enough.
>
> I don't see the words "buffer overflow" in my post, so maybe it's possible to
> write a signature to catch *any* instances exploiting a certain buffer
> overflow...but I'm more interested in the following. Can you write a *single*
> signature to detect this:
>
> POST / HTTP/1.1
>
> ...
> Content-Length: N (1000 <= N <= 204800)
>
> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....
>
> or
>
> BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB....
>
> or
>
> 11111111111111111111.....
>
> (N times the same byte value, and each request a different byte)
>
>
> I would be really thankful (and I'm not being sarcastic).

I don't know if any IDS could do this.  You'd have to capture the value of 
Content-Length, insert that value into a variable, then compare that variable 
against the number of bytes of a single value, all while examining the same 
packet.

Conceptually, the rule would look like this:

alert tcp any any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg: "Web attack - overflow 
attempt"; flow: to_server, established; content:"POST /"; http-method; 
content:"Content-Length3A"; nocase;  depth:1; content:"This is where you would 
have to capture the value of Content-Length"; urilen:"value of Content-Length"; 
pcre:"/\w/"; classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
*******************************************
Check the headers before clicking on Reply.