Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: A good NAT for Linux
From: David Lang <dlang () diginsite com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:12:20 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- the built-in masquerading will do a many-one NAT which will allow your workstations to access the outside world, if you need to allow outside connections in it gets quite a bit tricker to do and there are several third-party packages and work arounds you can do. David Lang On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Steven Osman wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:06:22 -0500 From: Steven Osman <sosman () terratron com> To: firewall-wizards () nfr net Cc: Steven Osman <sosman () terratron com> Subject: A good NAT for Linux Anyone know of a good NAT server and proxy server (either together or as separate packages) for Linux? Basically what I'm trying to achieve is this : Taking one single IP address (say, from a dialup or a DSL connection) which may or may not be static, and fanning it out to a number of workstations (like 6 or so), and providing them as much freedom as possible to run different applications. I was hoping that between a www and ftp proxy, and a socks proxy, I'd have most applications covered, and then I'd use NAT for any off-the-wall applications that may be running. Any ideas? Steven p.s. If it's free, that's better of course :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNmWRFj7msCGEppcbAQFrPwf+Npo1SnTNhNNJ728obLHpkr51W+fD9CNZ S8Oj3uDkYgAT33qDa99C+AiS3wdoyLfgItKc+pMIS9roj/aM72SfDFIF3Sw+gV5F b2SjJTSAcIR3a3ujsBu4nEhFqlfcHNsRkqPBRxd2v/W9k9wqhgm6g9oWlsXCooQ3 0OV2k6CpndfK/simR9U0TIDSDQhzoriv4f3GVatzJYBq3ZccFWwpTGhICkcz4+EH R5EAa3b20Xa9yfr+nVNAWWm9QCTpjdR8sk8Hwdj2n1LdM3ROgV6cqY0U8IT38beg nkGjILynt5YWy/cSPwB5ZJXpG46zkew2IgyhA4iGkj0UyfVnxK1TgQ== =MKkF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- A good NAT for Linux Steven Osman (Dec 02)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux David Lang (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Gigi Sullivan (Dec 04)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Michael Kyle (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux pmsac (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Smoot Carl-Mitchell (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Frank O'Dwyer (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Aaron D. Turner (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Michael T. Shinn (Dec 03)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Jason Axley (Dec 07)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Mailing Lists (Dec 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A good NAT for Linux Steven Osman (Dec 03)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: A good NAT for Linux David Lang (Dec 03)