Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Shodan value
From: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks () VT EDU>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:24:58 -0400
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:53:22 -0600, Cameron Dixon said:
Yes, it could be asserted by e.g., a university, that the vulnerabilities found on their network impact them regardless of whether they manage the devices on their network. A university could also attempt to claim some âownershipâ over user devices by stating that an acceptable use agreement was signed, binding their uses to some conditions. While both may be true, it is not reasonable that the Department of Homeland Security should be, or have the appearance of, scan1ning individual, independent citizens who didn't sign up to be scanned.
You guys willing to work with a university that says "We have 2 /16's, but we're only really worried about these 12 /24's in that space?" Also, do you do IPv6? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Shodan value, (continued)
- Re: Shodan value Nicholas Garigliano (Jul 21)
- Re: Shodan value Andre DiMino (Jul 24)
- Re: Shodan value Rich Graves (Jul 20)
- Re: Shodan value Reyor, William F. (Jul 20)
- Re: Shodan value Valdis Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- Re: Shodan value Reyor, William F. (Jul 20)
- Re: Shodan value Kevin Wilcox (Jul 28)
- Re: Shodan value Ashley Penchion (Jul 28)
- Re: Shodan value Dixon, Cameron (Jul 31)
- Re: Shodan value Valdis Kletnieks (Jul 28)